lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:53:43 +0000
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, arnd@...db.de,
        ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
        james.morse@....com, kristina.martsenko@....com,
        takahiro.akashi@...aro.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, toshi.kani@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: Fix the page leak in pud/pmd_set_huge

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:18:24PM +0530, Chintan Pandya wrote:
> While setting huge page, we need to take care of
> previously existing next level mapping. Since,
> we are going to overrite previous mapping, the
> only reference to next level page table will get
> lost and the next level page table will be zombie,
> occupying space forever. So, free it before
> overriding.

> @@ -939,6 +940,9 @@ int pud_set_huge(pud_t *pudp, phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	BUG_ON(phys & ~PUD_MASK);
> +	if (pud_val(*pud) && !pud_huge(*pud))
> +		free_page((unsigned long)__va(pud_val(*pud)));
> +
>  	set_pud(pudp, pfn_pud(__phys_to_pfn(phys), sect_prot));
>  	return 1;
>  }
> @@ -953,6 +957,9 @@ int pmd_set_huge(pmd_t *pmdp, phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	BUG_ON(phys & ~PMD_MASK);
> +	if (pmd_val(*pmd) && !pmd_huge(*pmd))
> +		free_page((unsigned long)__va(pmd_val(*pmd)));
> +

As Marc noted, (assuming the subsequent revert is applied) in both of
these cases, these tables are still live, and thus it is not safe to
free them.

Consider that immediately after freeing the pages, they may get
re-allocated elsewhere, where they may be modified. If this happens
before TLB invalidation, page table walks may allocate junk into TLBs,
resulting in a number of problems.

It is *never* safe to free a live page table, therefore NAK to this
patch.

Thanks,
Mark.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ