linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/14] mm/hmm: fix header file if/else/endif maze

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:09:59 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     jglisse@...hat.com
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Evgeny Baskakov <ebaskakov@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] mm/hmm: fix header file if/else/endif maze

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:14:07 -0400 jglisse@...hat.com wrote:

> From: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
> 
> The #if/#else/#endif for IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HMM) were wrong.

"were wrong" is not a sufficient explanation of the problem, especially
if we're requesting a -stable backport.  Please fully describe the
effects of a bug when fixing it?