linux-kernel - [martinbrandenburg:for-next 20/24] fs/orangefs/file.c:586:5: sparse: symbol 'orangefs_flush' was not declared. Should it be static?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:15:33 +0800
From:   kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:     Martin Brandenburg <martin@...ibond.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...org, Mike Marshall <hubcap@...ibond.com>,
        devel@...ts.orangefs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [martinbrandenburg:for-next 20/24] fs/orangefs/file.c:586:5: sparse:
 symbol 'orangefs_flush' was not declared. Should it be static?

tree:   https://github.com/martinbrandenburg/linux for-next
head:   f73753424e408389a77bcfa9b04beb41f0f6b2f8
commit: 27dd09ddfeca4937da105e89ded1ba3d35e1038e [20/24] orangefs: implement writepage
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        git checkout 27dd09ddfeca4937da105e89ded1ba3d35e1038e
        make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
        make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

   fs/orangefs/file.c:428:35: sparse: symbol 'orangefs_file_vm_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> fs/orangefs/file.c:586:5: sparse: symbol 'orangefs_flush' was not declared. Should it be static?
--
>> fs/orangefs/inode.c:88:5: sparse: symbol 'orangefs_write_end' was not declared. Should it be static?

Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation