linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] Uprobe: Export vaddr <-> offset conversion functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:24:28 +0530
From:   Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     mhiramat@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, acme@...nel.org,
        ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, alexis.berlemont@...il.com,
        corbet@....net, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, huawei.libin@...wei.com,
        hughd@...gle.com, jack@...e.cz, jglisse@...hat.com,
        jolsa@...hat.com, kan.liang@...el.com,
        kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, kjlx@...pleofstupid.com,
        kstewart@...uxfoundation.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, mhocko@...e.com,
        milian.wolff@...b.com, mingo@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
        naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, pc@...ibm.com,
        pombredanne@...b.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, willy@...radead.org,
        yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
        Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Uprobe: Export vaddr <-> offset conversion functions



On 03/15/2018 09:57 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:25:56 +0530
> Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> No functionality changes.
> Please add a detailed explanation why this patch is needed. All commits
> should be self sufficient and stand on their own. If I were to come up
> to this patch via a git blame, I would be clueless to why it was done.

Sure Steve, Will add description it in next series.

Thanks for the review,
Ravi