lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 17 Mar 2018 15:38:06 +0800
From:   Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Hao, Shun" <shun.hao@...el.com>, LKP <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [asm-generic:asm-generic] BUILD SUCCESS
 18fd258e74835b40a4f89f11ae933267866cc7af

Hi Arnd,

CC Shun, who maintains the kbuild test code now.

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 09:00:59PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 8:34 PM, kbuild test robot
><fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
>> tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic.git  asm-generic
>> branch HEAD: 18fd258e74835b40a4f89f11ae933267866cc7af  staging: iio: remove iio-trig-bfin-timer driver
>>
>> elapsed time: 192m
>>
>> configs tested: 176
>>
>> The following configs have been built successfully.
>> More configs may be tested in the coming days.
>>
>> blackfin                BF526-EZBRD_defconfig
>> blackfin                BF533-EZKIT_defconfig
>> blackfin            BF561-EZKIT-SMP_defconfig
>> blackfin                  TCM-BF537_defconfig
>> cris                 etrax-100lx_v2_defconfig
>> mn10300                     asb2364_defconfig
>> frv                                 defconfig
>> tile                         tilegx_defconfig
>> m32r                       m32104ut_defconfig
>> m32r                     mappi3.smp_defconfig
>> m32r                         opsput_defconfig
>> m32r                           usrv_defconfig
>> score                      spct6600_defconfig
>
>Hi Fengguang,
>
>Something odd is going in with the reporting here. I got individual reports for
>a number of the above that they failed, but the summary for the branch
>reports the builds as successful.

Yes that looks like a problem. However I don't see obviously clues by
looking at the log file. Perhaps we'll need some more verbose logging
in the hope we can catch the root cause next time it shows up.

>This branch contains the removal of blackfin, cris, mn10300, frv, tile, score,
>m32r, and metag, so none of the above should be marked as successful.
>
>You may want to prevent them from being built in the future, but it also
>seems the reporting needs to be checked.

Good to know that -- I just send patch to remove tests on those archs.

Thanks,
Fengguang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ