linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/8] trace_uprobe/sdt: Fix multiple update of same reference counter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:40:51 +0100
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:     Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     mhiramat@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, acme@...nel.org,
        ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, alexis.berlemont@...il.com,
        corbet@....net, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, huawei.libin@...wei.com,
        hughd@...gle.com, jack@...e.cz, jglisse@...hat.com,
        jolsa@...hat.com, kan.liang@...el.com,
        kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, kjlx@...pleofstupid.com,
        kstewart@...uxfoundation.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, mhocko@...e.com,
        milian.wolff@...b.com, mingo@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
        naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, pc@...ibm.com,
        pombredanne@...b.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, willy@...radead.org,
        yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, fengguang.wu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] trace_uprobe/sdt: Fix multiple update of same
 reference counter

Hi Ravi,

On 03/19, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>
> On 03/16/2018 11:20 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > And it seems that you are trying to confuse yourself, not only me ;) Just
> > suppose that an application does mmap+munmap in a loop and the mapped region
> > contains uprobe but not the counter.
>
> this is fine because ...

Yes, I guess I tried to say "counter but not uprobe" but possibly I was actually
confused.

> Our initial design was to increment counter in install_breakpoint() but
> uprobed instruction gets patched in a very early stage of binary loading
> and vma that holds the counter may not be mapped yet.

Yes, yes, I understand this is not that simple...

> > Btw, why do we need a counter, not a boolean? Who else can modify it?
> > Or different uprobes can share the same counter?
>
> Yes, multiple SDT markers can share the counter.

OK, thanks.

Oleg.