linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/21] eeprom: at24: driver refactoring

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Mar 2018 16:52:19 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] eeprom: at24: driver refactoring

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 5:21 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> 2018-03-19 15:43 GMT+01:00 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>:
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>>> This series contains what I hope to be a non-controversial refactoring
>>> of the at24 eeprom driver.
>>>
>>> Most changes revolve around at24_probe() which became quite complicated
>>> and hard to read.
>>>
>>> The only functional changes are: disabling the internal locking
>>> mechanisms of regmap (since we already take care of that in the driver)
>>> and removing an if checking if byte_len is a power of 2 (as we do
>>> support models for which it's not true).
>>>
>>> All other patches affect readability and code structure.
>>>
>>> Tested with a couple models and different both for device tree and
>>> platform data modes.
>>
>> Is there any available tree with that series applied?
>> I would test it on Intel Galileo Gen 2 which has ACPI enumerated AT24
>> EEPROM attached.
>>
>
> Yes, it's in my github tree:
>
>     https://github.com/brgl/linux    topic/at24/refactoring
>
> Thanks in advance for testing it!

At least this didn't break AT24 on Intel Galileo Gen 2 board in ACPI mode.

Tested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko