lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 23 Mar 2018 13:04:18 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     okaya@...eaurora.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
        sulrich@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, ariel.elior@...ium.com,
        everest-linux-l2@...ium.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] bnx2x: Eliminate duplicate barriers on
 weakly-ordered archs

From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:51:47 -0400

> It could if txdata->tx_db was not a union. There is a data dependency
> between txdata->tx_db.data.prod and txdata->tx_db.raw. 
> 
> So, no reordering.

I don't see it that way, the code requires that:

 	txdata->tx_db.data.prod += nbd;

is visible before the doorbell update.

barrier() doesn't provide that.

Neither does writel_relaxed().  However plain writel() does.

Therefore the code is only correct as-is, and your change potentially
adds a reordering problem.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ