lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 23 Mar 2018 21:41:28 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
cc:     Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: syzbot rcu/debugobjects warning

On Fri, 23 Mar 2018, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Sorry. Here is the raw crash log: https://pastebin.com/raw/puvh0cXE
> (The kernel logs are toward the end with the above).

And that is interesting:

[  150.629667]  <IRQ> [  150.631700]  [<ffffffff81d96069>] dump_stack+0xc1/0x128
[  150.637051]  [<ffffffff81dfefb6>] ? __debug_object_init+0x526/0xc40
[  150.643431]  [<ffffffff8142fbd1>] panic+0x1bc/0x3a8
[  150.648416]  [<ffffffff8142fa15>] ? percpu_up_read_preempt_enable.constprop.53+0xd7/0xd7
[  150.656611]  [<ffffffff81430835>] ? load_image_and_restore+0xf9/0xf9
[  150.663070]  [<ffffffff81269efd>] ? vprintk_default+0x1d/0x30
[  150.668925]  [<ffffffff81131879>] ? __warn+0x1a9/0x1e0
[  150.674170]  [<ffffffff81dfefb6>] ? __debug_object_init+0x526/0xc40
[  150.680543]  [<ffffffff81131894>] __warn+0x1c4/0x1e0
[  150.685614]  [<ffffffff81131afc>] warn_slowpath_null+0x2c/0x40
[  150.691972]  [<ffffffff81dfefb6>] __debug_object_init+0x526/0xc40
[  150.698174]  [<ffffffff81dfea90>] ? debug_object_fixup+0x30/0x30
[  150.704283]  [<ffffffff81dff709>] debug_object_init_on_stack+0x19/0x20
[  150.710917]  [<ffffffff81287a93>] __wait_rcu_gp+0x93/0x1b0
[  150.716508]  [<ffffffff81290251>] synchronize_rcu.part.65+0x101/0x110
[  150.723054]  [<ffffffff81290150>] ? rcu_pm_notify+0xc0/0xc0
[  150.728735]  [<ffffffff81292bc0>] ? __call_rcu.constprop.72+0x910/0x910
[  150.735459]  [<ffffffff81235221>] ? __lock_is_held+0xa1/0xf0
[  150.741223]  [<ffffffff81290287>] synchronize_rcu+0x27/0x90

So this calls synchronize_rcu from a rcu callback. That's a nono. This is
on the back of an interrupt in softirq context and __wait_rcu_gp() can
sleep, which is obviously a bad idea in softirq context....

Cc'ed netdev ....

And that also explains the debug object splat because this is not running
on the task stack. It's running on the softirq stack ....

[  150.746908]  [<ffffffff83588b35>] __l2tp_session_unhash+0x3d5/0x550
[  150.753281]  [<ffffffff8358891f>] ? __l2tp_session_unhash+0x1bf/0x550
[  150.759828]  [<ffffffff8114596a>] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x6a/0xd0
[  150.766123]  [<ffffffff8358ddb0>] ? l2tp_udp_encap_recv+0xd90/0xd90
[  150.772497]  [<ffffffff83588e97>] l2tp_tunnel_closeall+0x1e7/0x3a0
[  150.778782]  [<ffffffff835897be>] l2tp_tunnel_destruct+0x30e/0x5a0
[  150.785067]  [<ffffffff8358965a>] ? l2tp_tunnel_destruct+0x1aa/0x5a0
[  150.791537]  [<ffffffff835894b0>] ? l2tp_tunnel_del_work+0x460/0x460
[  150.797997]  [<ffffffff82ee8053>] __sk_destruct+0x53/0x570
[  150.803588]  [<ffffffff81293918>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x898/0x1300
[  150.810048]  [<ffffffff812939f7>] ? rcu_process_callbacks+0x977/0x1300
[  150.816684]  [<ffffffff82ee8000>] ? __sk_dst_check+0x240/0x240
[  150.822625]  [<ffffffff838be5d6>] __do_softirq+0x206/0x951
[  150.828223]  [<ffffffff81147315>] irq_exit+0x165/0x190
[  150.833557]  [<ffffffff838bd1eb>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x7b/0xa0
[  150.840018]  [<ffffffff838b9470>] apic_timer_interrupt+0xa0/0xb0
[  150.846132]  <EOI> [  150.848166]  [<ffffffff838b6756>] ? native_safe_halt+0x6/0x10
[  150.854036]  [<ffffffff8123bf2d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[  150.859973]  [<ffffffff838b5d85>] default_idle+0x55/0x360
[  150.865478]  [<ffffffff8106be0a>] arch_cpu_idle+0xa/0x10
[  150.870896]  [<ffffffff838b6b96>] default_idle_call+0x36/0x60
[  150.876751]  [<ffffffff81226cb0>] cpu_startup_entry+0x2b0/0x380
[  150.882787]  [<ffffffff81226a00>] ? cpu_in_idle+0x20/0x20
[  150.888291]  [<ffffffff812d2343>] ? clockevents_register_device+0x123/0x200
[  150.895358]  [<ffffffff810b0693>] start_secondary+0x303/0x3e0
[  150.901209]  [<ffffffff810b0390>] ? set_cpu_sibling_map+0x11f0/0x11f0

Thanks,

	tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ