linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 21/21] perf-probe: Add array argument support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:53:38 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        linux-trace-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 21/21] perf-probe: Add array argument support

On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:19:46 +0530
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi Masami :)
> 
> On 03/22/2018 03:53 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:29:59 +0530
> > Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Is it okay to allow user to specify array size with type field?
> > Fro this patch, yes.
> 
> So IIUC, perf _tool_ will allow user to record array either with "name[range]"
> or by "name:type[length]". Please correct me if that's wrong.

Yes, it is correct.

> And If perf tool will allow array length along with TYPE field, I guess we should
> document that in man perf-probe?

Ah, right. OK, I'll add it.

Thanks!

> 
> Otherwise,
> 
> Acked-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Thanks,
> Ravi
> 
> >  The availability of type is checked only when
> > it is automatically generated.
> > IMO, it should be done in another patch, something like
> > "Validate user specified type casting" patch. Would you need it?
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>