lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 30 Mar 2018 10:10:57 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Michel Pollet <michel.pollet@...renesas.com>
Cc:     Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
        Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>,
        Michel Pollet <buserror+upstream@...il.com>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] DT: arm: Add Renesas RZ/N1 SoC base device tree file

Hi Michel,

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Michel Pollet
<michel.pollet@...renesas.com> wrote:
> This adds the Renesas RZ/N1 Family (Part #R9A06G0xx) SoC
> bare bone support.
>
> This currently only handles generic parts (gic, architected timer)
> and a UART.
> For simplicity sake, this also relies on the bootloader to set the
> pinctrl and clocks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michel Pollet <michel.pollet@...renesas.com>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g0xx.dtsi

As I said on IRC, I'm not so happy with this r9a06g0xx.dtsi file without
SoC-specific compatible values, as you have to override all of them in
r9a06g032.dtsi and r9a06g033.dtsi

Moreover, in this series you dropped r9a06g032.dtsi, so the devices no longer
have SoC-specific compatible values?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ