lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 3 Apr 2018 22:08:39 +0200
From:   Mylène Josserand <mylene.josserand@...tlin.com>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        quentin.schulz@...tlin.com, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/13] ARM: sun9i: smp: Add is_sun9i field

Hi,

On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 16:48:41 +0800
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 08:18:34AM +0200, Mylène Josserand wrote:  
> >> To prepare the support of sun8i-a83t, add a field in the smp_data
> >> structure to enable the case of sun9i.
> >>
> >> Start to handle the differences between sun9i-a80 and sun8i-a83t
> >> by using this variable.
> >>
> >> Add an index to retrieve which structures we are using.  
> >
> > This should have been in a separate commit, but maybe we can store a
> > pointer to the array cell we're using instead of always using the
> > index?  
> 
> Using a pointer would also avoid some of the code movement from the
> previous patch.
> 
> ChenYu

Yep, I will use a pointer instead. Thanks for the correction.

Best regards,

-- 
Mylène Josserand, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://bootlin.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ