lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 7 Apr 2018 13:43:05 +0300
From:   Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>
To:     rishabhb@...eaurora.org,
        Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tsoni@...eaurora.org,
        kyan@...eaurora.org, ckadabi@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drivers: soc: Add LLCC driver

Hi,

On  4.04.2018 20:30, rishabhb@...eaurora.org wrote:
> Hi Stanimir,
> We incorporated all your comments except the following:
> 1. Removing the driver that maintains the SCT (system cache table)
> per chipset. As responded earlier the data is expected to change
> from chipset to chipset and would clutter the main driver if we
> choose using compatible string. We think its good to keep the data
> separate from core driver.
> 2. Changing struct llcc_slice_desc to llcc_desc:
> The descriptor is specific to each slice and not the whole llcc.
> All the properties such as id and size are specific to each slice
> and not whole llcc.
> 
> please let me know if you are ok with the approach. Based on that
> I can send my next revision of changes.

Yes, please go ahead and send the next version.

regards,
Stan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ