lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon,  9 Apr 2018 14:40:55 +0800
From:   Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
To:     wsa@...-dreams.de
Cc:     broonie@...nel.org, baolin.wang@...aro.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: sprd: Fix the i2c count issue

We found the I2C controller count register is unreliable sometimes,
that will cause I2C to lose data. Thus we can read the data count
from 'i2c_dev->count' instead of the I2C controller count register.

Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sprd.c |    6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sprd.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sprd.c
index 2fdad63..4053259 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sprd.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sprd.c
@@ -368,13 +368,12 @@ static irqreturn_t sprd_i2c_isr_thread(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	struct sprd_i2c *i2c_dev = dev_id;
 	struct i2c_msg *msg = i2c_dev->msg;
 	bool ack = !(readl(i2c_dev->base + I2C_STATUS) & I2C_RX_ACK);
-	u32 i2c_count = readl(i2c_dev->base + I2C_COUNT);
 	u32 i2c_tran;
 
 	if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
 		i2c_tran = i2c_dev->count >= I2C_FIFO_FULL_THLD;
 	else
-		i2c_tran = i2c_count;
+		i2c_tran = i2c_dev->count;
 
 	/*
 	 * If we got one ACK from slave when writing data, and we did not
@@ -412,14 +411,13 @@ static irqreturn_t sprd_i2c_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
 	struct sprd_i2c *i2c_dev = dev_id;
 	struct i2c_msg *msg = i2c_dev->msg;
-	u32 i2c_count = readl(i2c_dev->base + I2C_COUNT);
 	bool ack = !(readl(i2c_dev->base + I2C_STATUS) & I2C_RX_ACK);
 	u32 i2c_tran;
 
 	if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
 		i2c_tran = i2c_dev->count >= I2C_FIFO_FULL_THLD;
 	else
-		i2c_tran = i2c_count;
+		i2c_tran = i2c_dev->count;
 
 	/*
 	 * If we did not get one ACK from slave when writing data, then we
-- 
1.7.9.5

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ