linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/93] 3.18.103-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Apr 2018 10:13:21 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuahkh@....samsung.com,
        patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/93] 3.18.103-stable review

On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 10:26:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 05:13:32PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 07:07:26AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:22:29PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.18.103 release.
> > > > There are 93 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Responses should be made by Sun Apr  8 08:42:04 UTC 2018.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Not full results this time, sorry (my build system is corrupted),
> > 
> > Ah, I was wondering what happened to your web results, sorry about this :(
> > 
> > > but there are various build failures in 3.18.y.
> > > 
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c: In function 'fec_drv_remove':
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c:3342:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'pm_runtime_put'
> > 
> > Gotta love how 0-day doesn't catch these :(
> 
> kernel.ci caught it :(
> 
> > I thought I fixed this up for the 4.4.y tree already, let me dig...
> 
> No, I didn't fix this for 4.4.y, that was something else.  Should be
> easy for me to resolve for the next 3.18.y release.

Ok, added the needed .h file.

thanks,

greg k-h