linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RFC] tools/power turbostat: if --max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:53:35 +0300
From:   Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Yu Chen <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Cc:     Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] tools/power turbostat: if --max_loop, print for
 specific time of loops

On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 12:22 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:18 PM, Yu Chen <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
> wrote:
> > From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
> > 
> > There's a use case during test to only print specific round of
> > loops
> > if --interval is specified, for example, with this patch applied:
> > 
> > turbostat -i 5 --max_loops 4
> > will capture 4 samples with 5 seconds interval.
> 
> Why --max_loops and not just --loops or --iterations?

Or just --count.

Artem.