linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH ghak80 V1] audit: add syscall information to FEATURE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Apr 2018 18:06:24 -0400
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc:     Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ghak80 V1] audit: add syscall information to
 FEATURE_CHANGE records

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 8:46 AM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com> wrote:
> Tie syscall information to FEATURE_CHANGE calls since it is a result of
> user action.
>
> See: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/80
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/audit.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index 8da24ef..23f125b 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -1103,10 +1103,9 @@ static void audit_log_feature_change(int which, u32 old_feature, u32 new_feature
>  {
>         struct audit_buffer *ab;
>
> -       if (audit_enabled == AUDIT_OFF)
> +       if (!audit_enabled)

Sooo, this is an unrelated style change, why?  Looking at the rest of
kernel/audit.c we seem to use a mix of "(!x)" and "(x == 0/CONST)" so
why are you adding noise to this patch?

>                 return;
> -
> -       ab = audit_log_start(NULL, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_FEATURE_CHANGE);
> +       ab = audit_log_start(current->audit_context, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_FEATURE_CHANGE);

This is the important part, and the Right Thing To Do.

>         if (!ab)
>                 return;
>         audit_log_task_info(ab, current);
> --
> 1.8.3.1

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com