linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/livepatch: introduce tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Apr 2018 10:06:04 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
cc:     Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Libor Pecháček <lpechacek@...e.com>,
        Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>,
        Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/livepatch: introduce tests

On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, Petr Mladek wrote:

> On Mon 2018-04-16 13:33:55, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Apr 2018, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> > > Thanks for reviewing.  I'll hold off on posting v4 until Petr (and
> > > others) get a chance to comment.  Perhaps there are other tests that
> > > would be helpful?
> 
> > I think it would be useful to have tests for a stack checking and a 
> > consistency. Nicolai has written some lately for our internal testing, but 
> > it would take some time to transform them appropriately, I think.
> 
> The future of the stack handling is not clear at the moment. We should
> wait how the discussion goes before spending time on test cases for
> the current behavior.

You're talking about something different. We have to check stacks of all 
tasks while patching in order to achieve consistency. Tests for that would 
be useful.

Miroslav