linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: davinci: remove the mach-specific aemif driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:41:30 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Cc:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: davinci: remove the mach-specific
 aemif driver - part 1

2018-04-17 14:36 GMT+02:00 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>:
> 2018-04-17 12:53 GMT+02:00 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>:
>> Hi Bartosz,
>>
>> On Tuesday 17 April 2018 03:59 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>>>
>>> This is the first part of changes required to remove duplicate aemif
>>> support from mach-davinci.
>>>
>>> I actually noticed that one of my previous changes from 2017 broke nand
>>> in legacy mode - the clock lookup no longer works. This series addresses
>>> it as well.
>>>
>>> First patch just uses a static string for the ti-aemif driver name.
>>>
>>> The second adds support for board files to the aemif driver.
>>>
>>> Last two add nand support to da850-lcdk in legacy mode and make
>>> da850-evm use the platform driver instead of the mach-specific one.
>>>
>>> If these patches get accepted, I'll prepere a follow-up moving all
>>> other boards to the new platform driver.
>>>
>>> This series applies on top of v8 of David Lechner's CCF series.
>>
>> Are there any patches in the series that can safely be applied to v4.17-rc1?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sekhar
>
> Hi Sekhar,
>
> yes, all of them. They're not linked to David's work in any way.
>
> Bart

Oops, -ETOOFAST, I rebased it on top of David's v9, let me check how
it works with mainline - it should be mostly fine.

Bart