linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: davinci: remove the mach-specific aemif driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:59:10 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: davinci: remove the mach-specific
 aemif driver - part 1

2018-04-17 14:41 GMT+02:00 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>:
> 2018-04-17 14:36 GMT+02:00 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>:
>> 2018-04-17 12:53 GMT+02:00 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>:
>>> Hi Bartosz,
>>>
>>> On Tuesday 17 April 2018 03:59 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>>>>
>>>> This is the first part of changes required to remove duplicate aemif
>>>> support from mach-davinci.
>>>>
>>>> I actually noticed that one of my previous changes from 2017 broke nand
>>>> in legacy mode - the clock lookup no longer works. This series addresses
>>>> it as well.
>>>>
>>>> First patch just uses a static string for the ti-aemif driver name.
>>>>
>>>> The second adds support for board files to the aemif driver.
>>>>
>>>> Last two add nand support to da850-lcdk in legacy mode and make
>>>> da850-evm use the platform driver instead of the mach-specific one.
>>>>
>>>> If these patches get accepted, I'll prepere a follow-up moving all
>>>> other boards to the new platform driver.
>>>>
>>>> This series applies on top of v8 of David Lechner's CCF series.
>>>
>>> Are there any patches in the series that can safely be applied to v4.17-rc1?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sekhar
>>
>> Hi Sekhar,
>>
>> yes, all of them. They're not linked to David's work in any way.
>>
>> Bart
>
> Oops, -ETOOFAST, I rebased it on top of David's v9, let me check how
> it works with mainline - it should be mostly fine.
>
> Bart

Ok, so the patches apply and build nicely on top of v4.17-rc1, but
they only actually work with David's v9 branch. On the other hand nand
doesn't work with mainline now anyway so I assume it's safe to apply
them and wait for David's patches to be merged.

Thanks,
Bartosz