linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] xen: xen-pciback: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in pcistub

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:09:31 -0400
From:   Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To:     Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>, jgross@...e.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xen: xen-pciback: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL
 in pcistub_probe

On 04/09/2018 11:03 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> pcistub_probe() is never called in atomic context.
> This function is only set as ".probe" in struct pci_driver.
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context,
> pcistub_probe() calls kmalloc() with GFP_ATOMIC,
> which does not sleep for allocation.
> GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary and can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL,
> which can sleep and improve the possibility of sucessful allocation.
>
> This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
> And I also manually check it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
>


Applied the series and the extra patch to for-linus-4.17

-boris