linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] X.509: unpack RSA signatureValue field from BIT STRING

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Apr 2018 17:11:54 +0200
From:   "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
To:     Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@...tner.samsung.com>
Cc:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Gary Hook <gary.hook@....com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] X.509: unpack RSA signatureValue field from BIT STRING

On 17.04.2018 17:07, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> 
> 
> On 17.04.2018 15:39, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> The signatureValue field of a X.509 certificate is encoded as a BIT STRING.
>> For RSA signatures this BIT STRING is of so-called primitive subtype, which
>> contains a u8 prefix indicating a count of unused bits in the encoding.
>>
>> We have to strip this prefix from signature data, just as we already do for
>> key data in x509_extract_key_data() function.
>>
>> This wasn't noticed earlier because this prefix byte is zero for RSA key
>> sizes divisible by 8. Since BIT STRING is a big-endian encoding adding zero
>> prefixes has no bearing on its value.
>>
>> The signature length, however was incorrect, which is a problem for RSA
>> implementations that need it to be exactly correct (like AMD CCP).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
> 
> your e-mail address looks incorrect
> 
> [...]
> 

What's wrong with it?

Maciej