| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 17:59:28 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Lucash Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 49/49] nfsd: fix incorrect umasks
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>
commit 880a3a5325489a143269a8e172e7563ebf9897bc upstream.
We're neglecting to clear the umask after it's set, which can cause a
later unrelated rpc to (incorrectly) use the same umask if it happens to
be processed by the same thread.
There's a more subtle problem here too:
An NFSv4 compound request is decoded all in one pass before any
operations are executed.
Currently we're setting current->fs->umask at the time we decode the
compound. In theory a single compound could contain multiple creates
each setting a umask. In that case we'd end up using whichever umask
was passed in the *last* operation as the umask for all the creates,
whether that was correct or not.
So, we should just be saving the umask at decode time and waiting to set
it until we actually process the corresponding operation.
In practice it's unlikely any client would do multiple creates in a
single compound. And even if it did they'd likely be from the same
process (hence carry the same umask). So this is a little academic, but
we should get it right anyway.
Fixes: 47057abde515 (nfsd: add support for the umask attribute)
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reported-by: Lucash Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 12 ++++++++++--
fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 8 +++-----
fs/nfsd/xdr4.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
* NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
* SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
*/
+#include <linux/fs_struct.h>
#include <linux/file.h>
#include <linux/falloc.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -252,11 +253,13 @@ do_open_lookup(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, s
* Note: create modes (UNCHECKED,GUARDED...) are the same
* in NFSv4 as in v3 except EXCLUSIVE4_1.
*/
+ current->fs->umask = open->op_umask;
status = do_nfsd_create(rqstp, current_fh, open->op_fname.data,
open->op_fname.len, &open->op_iattr,
*resfh, open->op_createmode,
(u32 *)open->op_verf.data,
&open->op_truncate, &open->op_created);
+ current->fs->umask = 0;
if (!status && open->op_label.len)
nfsd4_security_inode_setsecctx(*resfh, &open->op_label, open->op_bmval);
@@ -608,6 +611,7 @@ nfsd4_create(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, str
if (status)
return status;
+ current->fs->umask = create->cr_umask;
switch (create->cr_type) {
case NF4LNK:
status = nfsd_symlink(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh,
@@ -616,20 +620,22 @@ nfsd4_create(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, str
break;
case NF4BLK:
+ status = nfserr_inval;
rdev = MKDEV(create->cr_specdata1, create->cr_specdata2);
if (MAJOR(rdev) != create->cr_specdata1 ||
MINOR(rdev) != create->cr_specdata2)
- return nfserr_inval;
+ goto out_umask;
status = nfsd_create(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh,
create->cr_name, create->cr_namelen,
&create->cr_iattr, S_IFBLK, rdev, &resfh);
break;
case NF4CHR:
+ status = nfserr_inval;
rdev = MKDEV(create->cr_specdata1, create->cr_specdata2);
if (MAJOR(rdev) != create->cr_specdata1 ||
MINOR(rdev) != create->cr_specdata2)
- return nfserr_inval;
+ goto out_umask;
status = nfsd_create(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh,
create->cr_name, create->cr_namelen,
&create->cr_iattr,S_IFCHR, rdev, &resfh);
@@ -673,6 +679,8 @@ nfsd4_create(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, str
fh_dup2(&cstate->current_fh, &resfh);
out:
fh_put(&resfh);
+out_umask:
+ current->fs->umask = 0;
return status;
}
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
* SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
*/
-#include <linux/fs_struct.h>
#include <linux/file.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/namei.h>
@@ -683,7 +682,7 @@ nfsd4_decode_create(struct nfsd4_compoun
status = nfsd4_decode_fattr(argp, create->cr_bmval, &create->cr_iattr,
&create->cr_acl, &create->cr_label,
- ¤t->fs->umask);
+ &create->cr_umask);
if (status)
goto out;
@@ -928,7 +927,6 @@ nfsd4_decode_open(struct nfsd4_compounda
case NFS4_OPEN_NOCREATE:
break;
case NFS4_OPEN_CREATE:
- current->fs->umask = 0;
READ_BUF(4);
open->op_createmode = be32_to_cpup(p++);
switch (open->op_createmode) {
@@ -936,7 +934,7 @@ nfsd4_decode_open(struct nfsd4_compounda
case NFS4_CREATE_GUARDED:
status = nfsd4_decode_fattr(argp, open->op_bmval,
&open->op_iattr, &open->op_acl, &open->op_label,
- ¤t->fs->umask);
+ &open->op_umask);
if (status)
goto out;
break;
@@ -951,7 +949,7 @@ nfsd4_decode_open(struct nfsd4_compounda
COPYMEM(open->op_verf.data, NFS4_VERIFIER_SIZE);
status = nfsd4_decode_fattr(argp, open->op_bmval,
&open->op_iattr, &open->op_acl, &open->op_label,
- ¤t->fs->umask);
+ &open->op_umask);
if (status)
goto out;
break;
--- a/fs/nfsd/xdr4.h
+++ b/fs/nfsd/xdr4.h
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ struct nfsd4_create {
} u;
u32 cr_bmval[3]; /* request */
struct iattr cr_iattr; /* request */
+ int cr_umask; /* request */
struct nfsd4_change_info cr_cinfo; /* response */
struct nfs4_acl *cr_acl;
struct xdr_netobj cr_label;
@@ -228,6 +229,7 @@ struct nfsd4_open {
u32 op_why_no_deleg; /* response - DELEG_NONE_EXT only */
u32 op_create; /* request */
u32 op_createmode; /* request */
+ int op_umask; /* request */
u32 op_bmval[3]; /* request */
struct iattr op_iattr; /* UNCHECKED4, GUARDED4, EXCLUSIVE4_1 */
nfs4_verifier op_verf __attribute__((aligned(32)));
Powered by blists - more mailing lists