linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 43/66] arm64: KVM: Report SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Apr 2018 17:59:16 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 43/66] arm64: KVM: Report SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 BP hardening support

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>


From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>

commit 6167ec5c9145cdf493722dfd80a5d48bafc4a18a upstream.

A new feature of SMCCC 1.1 is that it offers firmware-based CPU
workarounds. In particular, SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 provides
BP hardening for CVE-2017-5715.

If the host has some mitigation for this issue, report that
we deal with it using SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, as we apply the
host workaround on every guest exit.

Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
[v4.9: account for files moved to virt/ upstream]
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> [v4.9 backport]
Tested-by: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h   |    6 ++++++
 arch/arm/kvm/psci.c               |    9 ++++++++-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |    5 +++++
 include/linux/arm-smccc.h         |    5 +++++
 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -318,4 +318,10 @@ static inline int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_
 	return -ENXIO;
 }
 
+static inline bool kvm_arm_harden_branch_predictor(void)
+{
+	/* No way to detect it yet, pretend it is not there. */
+	return false;
+}
+
 #endif /* __ARM_KVM_HOST_H__ */
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
@@ -403,13 +403,20 @@ int kvm_hvc_call_handler(struct kvm_vcpu
 {
 	u32 func_id = smccc_get_function(vcpu);
 	u32 val = PSCI_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
+	u32 feature;
 
 	switch (func_id) {
 	case ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_FUNC_ID:
 		val = ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_1_1;
 		break;
 	case ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID:
-		/* Nothing supported yet */
+		feature = smccc_get_arg1(vcpu);
+		switch(feature) {
+		case ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1:
+			if (kvm_arm_harden_branch_predictor())
+				val = 0;
+			break;
+		}
 		break;
 	default:
 		return kvm_psci_call(vcpu);
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -393,4 +393,9 @@ static inline void __cpu_init_stage2(voi
 		  "PARange is %d bits, unsupported configuration!", parange);
 }
 
+static inline bool kvm_arm_harden_branch_predictor(void)
+{
+	return cpus_have_cap(ARM64_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR);
+}
+
 #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_HOST_H__ */
--- a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
+++ b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
@@ -73,6 +73,11 @@
 			   ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32,				\
 			   0, 1)
 
+#define ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1					\
+	ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL,				\
+			   ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32,				\
+			   0, 0x8000)
+
 #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
 
 #include <linux/linkage.h>