linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: davinci: remove the mach-specific aemif driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Apr 2018 13:47:24 +0530
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:     Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
CC:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: davinci: remove the mach-specific
 aemif driver - part 1

On Tuesday 17 April 2018 10:59 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On 4/17/2018 5:36 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> 2018-04-17 12:53 GMT+02:00 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>:
>>> Hi Bartosz,
> 
> [...]
> 
>>>> This series applies on top of v8 of David Lechner's CCF series.
>>>
>>> Are there any patches in the series that can safely be applied to
>>> v4.17-rc1?
> 
>>
>> Hi Sekhar,
>>
>> yes, all of them. They're not linked to David's work in any way.
>>
> Please separate the driver/emif/* patches from the series. These
> are not fixes so they are not rcx candidates. But will queue them
> up for next merge window. Thanks !!

Thanks Santosh! Can you please queue the drivers/emif/ patches on an
immutable branch based off v4.17-rc1 which I can then merge to queue the
platform patches?

Thanks,
Sekhar