lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:09:53 +0200
From:   Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, acme@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
        Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf list: Add s390 support for detailed/verbose pmu
 event description

On 04/16/2018 04:43 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 03:23:14PM +0200, Thomas Richter wrote:
>> From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> Perf list with flags -d and -v print a description (-d) or
>> a very verbose explanation (-v) of CPU specific counter events.
>> These descriptions are provided with the json files in
>> directory pmu-events/arch/s390/*.json.
>>
>> Display of these descriptions on s390 requires the
>> corresponding json files.
>>
>> On s390 this does not work because function is_pmu_core()
>> does not detect the s390 directory name where the
>> CPU specific events are listed. On x86 it is
>>   /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu
>> whereas on s390 it is
>>   /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpum_cf
>>   /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpum_sf
>>
>> Fix this by adding s390 directory name testing to
>> function is_pmu_core(). This is the same approach as taken for
>> arm platform.
> 
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
>> index 1111d5bf15ca..8675ddf558c6 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
>> @@ -562,6 +562,12 @@ static int is_pmu_core(const char *name)
>>  	if (stat(path, &st) == 0)
>>  		return 1;
>>  
>> +	/* Look for cpu sysfs (specific to s390) */
>> +	scnprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/bus/event_source/devices/%s",
>> +		  sysfs, name);
>> +	if (stat(path, &st) == 0 && !strncmp(name, "cpum_", 5))
>> +		return 1;
>> +
> 
> This shouldn't adversely affect ARM, so FWIW:
> 
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> 

Arnaldo,

with Mark Acked-by can you please apply the patch.

Thanks a lot.
-- 
Thomas Richter, Dept 3303, IBM LTC Boeblingen Germany
--
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz 
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ