linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] irqchip: stm32: Optimizes and cleans up stm32-exti irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Apr 2018 09:18:28 +0200
From:   Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@...com>
To:     Radosław Pietrzyk <radoslaw.pietrzyk@...il.com>
CC:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/STM32 ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] irqchip: stm32: Optimizes and cleans up stm32-exti
 irq_domain

ok, So I include your patch in my serie
- irqchip: stm32: Optimizes and cleans up stm32-exti irq_domain

BR
Ludo

On 04/19/2018 10:03 PM, Radosław Pietrzyk wrote:
> Sure, I don't mind. I didn't have time to resend v3 with more verbose 
> description.
> 
> 2018-04-19 15:24 GMT+02:00 Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@...com 
> <mailto:ludovic.barre@...com>>:
> 
>     Hi Radoslaw
> 
>     I preparing a patch serie which add support of stm32mp1.
>     Would you like, I add your patch (with commit message updated)
>     in my serie?
>     patch:
>     -irqchip: stm32: Optimizes and cleans up stm32-exti irq_domain
> 
>     BR
>     Ludo
> 
> 
>     On 03/14/2018 01:04 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> 
>         On 14/03/18 11:46, Radosław Pietrzyk wrote:
> 
>             Hi Marc,
>             We had a quite fruitful discussion in this mail thread
>             regarding this
>             topic and Ludovic acked it so recently I have asked Thomas
>             if he still
>             needs this v3 patch with detailed explanation especially as
>             v2 version
>             of stm32-gpio patch has been already taken by Linus. However
>             if you
>             require I can resend v3 of this patch only with this
>             detailed explanation.
> 
> 
>         That'd be useful. The changelog is the only thing that will be
>         left from
>         this discussion, so it'd better be complete and accurate. If you
>         quickly
>         send a v3 for this single patch, I'll queue it right away.
> 
>         Thanks,
> 
>                  M.
> 
> 
>             2018-03-14 12:09 GMT+01:00 Marc Zyngier
>             <marc.zyngier@....com <mailto:marc.zyngier@....com>
>             <mailto:marc.zyngier@....com <mailto:marc.zyngier@....com>>>:
> 
>                   Radoslaw,
> 
>                   On 23/02/18 08:42, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>                   > Radoslaw,
>                   >
>                   > On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Radoslaw Pietrzyk wrote:
>                   >
>                   >> - discards setting handle_simple_irq handler for
>             hierarchy interrupts
>                   >> - removes acking in chained irq handler as this is
>             done by
>                   >> irq_chip itself inside handle_edge_irq
>                   >> - removes unneeded irq_domain_ops.xlate callback
>                   >
>                   > if that's all functionally correct, then this is a
>             nice cleanup. Though
>                   > from the above changelog its hard to tell because it
>             merily tells WHAT the
>                   > patch does, but not WHY. The WHY is the important
>             information for a
>                   > reviewer who is not familiar with the particular
>             piece of code/hardware.
>                   >
>                   > Can you please amend the changelog with proper
>             explanations why a
>                   > particular piece of code is not needed or has to be
>             changed to something
>                   > else?
> 
>                   Any update on this? I'd like to queue this for 4.17,
>             but Thomas'
>                   comments should be addressed before that happens. Ca
>             you please respin a
>                   version with a better change log and the various
>             review tags?
> 
>                   Thanks,
> 
>                           M.
>                   --
>                   Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
> 
> 
> 
> 
>