linux-kernel - Re: [uml-devel] [REVIEW][PATCH 19/22] signal/um: Use force_sig_fault in relay

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Apr 2018 17:06:10 +0100
From:   Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...-begemot.co.uk>
To:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
        "user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
        <user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [REVIEW][PATCH 19/22] signal/um: Use force_sig_fault
 in relay_signal.


On 04/20/18 15:38, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Today user mode linux only works on x86 and x86_64 and this allows
> simplifications of relay_signal.

I believe someone recently fixed the ARM port. I have not had the time 
to try the fixes though.

I have added the new list we are migrating to the cc list.

A.



>
> - x86 always set si_errno to 0 in fault handlers.
> - x86 does not implement si_trapno.
> - Only si_codes between SI_USER and SI_KERNEL have a fault address.
>
> Therefore warn if si_errno is set (it should never be).
> Use force_sig_info in the case where we know we have a good fault.
>
> For signals whose content it is not clear how to relay use plain
> force_sig and let the signal sending code come up with an
> appropriate generic siginfo.
>
> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
> Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> ---
>   arch/um/kernel/trap.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/trap.c b/arch/um/kernel/trap.c
> index d4d38520c4c6..5f0ff17cd790 100644
> --- a/arch/um/kernel/trap.c
> +++ b/arch/um/kernel/trap.c
> @@ -296,9 +296,6 @@ unsigned long segv(struct faultinfo fi, unsigned long ip, int is_user,
>   
>   void relay_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *si, struct uml_pt_regs *regs)
>   {
> -	struct faultinfo *fi;
> -	struct siginfo clean_si;
> -
>   	if (!UPT_IS_USER(regs)) {
>   		if (sig == SIGBUS)
>   			printk(KERN_ERR "Bus error - the host /dev/shm or /tmp "
> @@ -308,29 +305,30 @@ void relay_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *si, struct uml_pt_regs *regs)
>   
>   	arch_examine_signal(sig, regs);
>   
> -	clear_siginfo(&clean_si);
> -	clean_si.si_signo = si->si_signo;
> -	clean_si.si_errno = si->si_errno;
> -	clean_si.si_code = si->si_code;
> +	if (unlikely(si->si_errno)) {
> +		printk(KERN_ERR "Attempted to relay signal %d (si_code = %d) with errno %d\n",
> +		       sig, si->si_code, si->si_errno);
> +	}
>   	switch (sig) {
>   	case SIGILL:
>   	case SIGFPE:
>   	case SIGSEGV:
>   	case SIGBUS:
>   	case SIGTRAP:
> -		fi = UPT_FAULTINFO(regs);
> -		clean_si.si_addr = (void __user *) FAULT_ADDRESS(*fi);
> -		current->thread.arch.faultinfo = *fi;
> -#ifdef __ARCH_SI_TRAPNO
> -		clean_si.si_trapno = si->si_trapno;
> -#endif
> -		break;
> +		if ((si->si_code > SI_USER) && (si->si_code < SI_KERNEL)) {
> +			struct faultinfo *fi = UPT_FAULTINFO(regs);
> +			current->thread.arch.faultinfo = *fi;
> +			force_sig_fault(sig, si->si_code,
> +					(void __user *)FAULT_ADDRESS(*fi),
> +					current);
> +			break;
> +		}
>   	default:
>   		printk(KERN_ERR "Attempted to relay unknown signal %d (si_code = %d)\n",
>   			sig, si->si_code);
>   	}
>   
> -	force_sig_info(sig, &clean_si, current);
> +	force_sig(sig, current);
>   }
>   
>   void bus_handler(int sig, struct siginfo *si, struct uml_pt_regs *regs)