linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/MCE, EDAC/mce_amd: Save all aux registers on SMCA systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Apr 2018 20:03:01 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>
Cc:     "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/MCE, EDAC/mce_amd: Save all aux registers on SMCA
 systems

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 01:05:17PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> Okay, I can do that. What about using mce_rdmsrl()? The value gets set to
> 0 and a user gets a single warning. This may be more clear to the user. Also,
> it shouldn't affect code that checks for non-zero values, like in __print_mce().

Hmm, good point. From the looks of it, it shouldn't be a problem and a
MSR value of 0 is of no interest anyway. I *think*.

But pls make it a separate patch so that we can revert it in case
something doesn't work as expected and we've missed a case.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.