linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 01/10] PCI: dwc: Add MSI-X callbacks handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:36:32 +0100
From:   Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>
To:     Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        "Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com" <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
        "jingoohan1@...il.com" <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        "adouglas@...ence.com" <adouglas@...ence.com>,
        "niklas.cassel@...s.com" <niklas.cassel@...s.com>,
        "jesper.nilsson@...s.com" <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>
Cc:     "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 01/10] PCI: dwc: Add MSI-X callbacks handler

Hi Kishon,

On 16/04/2018 10:29, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi Gustavo,
> 
> On Tuesday 10 April 2018 10:44 PM, Gustavo Pimentel wrote:
>> Changes the pcie_raise_irq function signature, namely the interrupt_num
>> variable type from u8 to u16 to accommodate the MSI-X maximum interrupts
>> of 2048.
>>
>> Implements a PCIe config space capability iterator function to search and
>> save the MSI and MSI-X pointers. With this method the code becomes more
>> generic and flexible.
>>
>> Implements MSI-X set/get functions for sysfs interface in order to change
>> the EP entries number.
>>
>> Implements EP MSI-X interface for triggering interruptions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c           |   2 +-
>>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c         |   2 +-
>>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c   | 145 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c |   6 +-
>>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h      |  23 +++++-
>>  5 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
>> index ed8558d..5265725 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
>> @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ static void dra7xx_pcie_raise_msi_irq(struct dra7xx_pcie *dra7xx,
>>  }
>>  
>>  static int dra7xx_pcie_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
>> -				 enum pci_epc_irq_type type, u8 interrupt_num)
>> +				 enum pci_epc_irq_type type, u16 interrupt_num)
>>  {
>>  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
>>  	struct dra7xx_pcie *dra7xx = to_dra7xx_pcie(pci);
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c
>> index e66cede..96dc259 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-artpec6.c
>> @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static void artpec6_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
>>  }
>>  
>>  static int artpec6_pcie_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
>> -				  enum pci_epc_irq_type type, u8 interrupt_num)
>> +				  enum pci_epc_irq_type type, u16 interrupt_num)
>>  {
>>  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
>> index 15b22a6..874d4c2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
>> @@ -40,6 +40,44 @@ void dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(struct dw_pcie *pci, enum pci_barno bar)
>>  	__dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar, 0);
>>  }
>>  
>> +void dw_pcie_ep_find_cap_addr(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
>> +{
> 
> This should be implemented in a generic way similar to pci_find_capability().
> It'll be useful when we try to implement other capabilities as well.

Hum, what you suggest? Something implemented on the pci-epf-core?

> 
> Thanks
> Kishon
> 

Regards,
Gustavo