linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the qcom tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Apr 2018 03:39:25 +0000
From:   Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
To:     sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Cc:     agross@...eaurora.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Karthikeyan Ramasubramanian <kramasub@...eaurora.org>,
        Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>,
        Girish Mahadevan <girishm@...eaurora.org>, groeck@...omium.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the qcom tree

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 3:42 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
wrote:

> Hi Andy,

> After merging the qcom tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:

> ERROR: "geni_se_select_mode" [drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.ko]
undefined!
> ERROR: "geni_se_init" [drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "geni_se_config_packing" [drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.ko]
undefined!
> ERROR: "geni_se_resources_off" [drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.ko]
undefined!
> ERROR: "geni_se_resources_on" [drivers/tty/serial/qcom_geni_serial.ko]
undefined!

> Probably caused by commit

>    eddac5af0654 ("soc: qcom: Add GENI based QUP Wrapper driver")

> I have used the qcom tree from next-20180424 for today.

> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

Guenter and I had a fix for compile test here, which had failures that
looked similar:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/18/752

I was hoping to verify myself whether or not this fixed allmodconfig, but
my machine at home is not so fast, and I must be missing something, either
in the configuration or the tree. Which tree exactly are you building?
-Evan