lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 28 Apr 2018 09:28:47 +0200
From:   Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] PCI: Introduce devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources

On 2018-04-28 00:24, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 05:13:39PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
>>
>> of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources allocates the resource structures it
>> fills dynamically, but none of its callers care to release them so far.
>> Rather than requiring everyone to do this explicitly, introduce a
>> managed version of that service. This differs API-wise only in taking a
>> reference to the associated device, rather than to the device tree node.
>>
>> As of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources is an exported interface, we cannot
>> simply drop it at this point. After converting all in-tree users to the
>> new API, we could phase out the unmanaged one over some grace period.
> 
> It looks like it might be possible to split this into three or four
> patches:
> 
>   1) Factor __of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() out of
>      of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources()
> 
>   2) Add struct device * argument
> 
>   3) Convert pr_info() to dev_info()
> 
>   4) Add devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources()

Will do. I'm even considering

5) mark of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() __deprecated, due to the leak
   and no remaining in-tree user - what do you think?

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ