linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 38/61] mtd: cfi: cmdset_0002: Do not allow read/write to suspend erase block.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:24:41 -0700
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...inera.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 38/61] mtd: cfi: cmdset_0002: Do not allow read/write to suspend erase block.

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...inera.com>

commit 7b70eb14392a7cf505f9b358d06c33b5af73d1e7 upstream.

Currently it is possible to read and/or write to suspend EB's.
Writing /dev/mtdX or /dev/mtdblockX from several processes may
break the flash state machine.

Taken from cfi_cmdset_0001 driver.

Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...inera.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c |    9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
@@ -812,9 +812,10 @@ static int get_chip(struct map_info *map
 		    (mode == FL_WRITING && (cfip->EraseSuspend & 0x2))))
 			goto sleep;
 
-		/* We could check to see if we're trying to access the sector
-		 * that is currently being erased. However, no user will try
-		 * anything like that so we just wait for the timeout. */
+		/* Do not allow suspend iff read/write to EB address */
+		if ((adr & chip->in_progress_block_mask) ==
+		    chip->in_progress_block_addr)
+			goto sleep;
 
 		/* Erase suspend */
 		/* It's harmless to issue the Erase-Suspend and Erase-Resume
@@ -2263,6 +2264,7 @@ static int __xipram do_erase_chip(struct
 	chip->state = FL_ERASING;
 	chip->erase_suspended = 0;
 	chip->in_progress_block_addr = adr;
+	chip->in_progress_block_mask = ~(map->size - 1);
 
 	INVALIDATE_CACHE_UDELAY(map, chip,
 				adr, map->size,
@@ -2352,6 +2354,7 @@ static int __xipram do_erase_oneblock(st
 	chip->state = FL_ERASING;
 	chip->erase_suspended = 0;
 	chip->in_progress_block_addr = adr;
+	chip->in_progress_block_mask = ~(len - 1);
 
 	INVALIDATE_CACHE_UDELAY(map, chip,
 				adr, len,