linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] usb: dwc2: fix isoc split in transfer with no data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 May 2018 22:02:14 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...gle.com>
To:     William Wu <william.wu@...k-chips.com>
Cc:     hminas@...opsys.com, felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
        Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Frank Wang <frank.wang@...k-chips.com>,
        黄涛 <huangtao@...k-chips.com>,
        "daniel.meng" <daniel.meng@...k-chips.com>,
        John Youn <John.Youn@...opsys.com>,
        王征增 <wzz@...k-chips.com>,
        zsq@...k-chips.com, Allen.Hsu@...ntatw.com, StanTsui@...en.com,
        Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] usb: dwc2: fix isoc split in transfer with no data

Hi,

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 8:04 PM, William Wu <william.wu@...k-chips.com> wrote:
> If isoc split in transfer with no data (the length of DATA0
> packet is zero), we can't simply return immediately. Because
> the DATA0 can be the first transaction or the second transaction
> for the isoc split in transaction. If the DATA0 packet with no
> data is in the first transaction, we can return immediately.
> But if the DATA0 packet with no data is in the second transaction
> of isoc split in transaction sequence, we need to increase the
> qtd->isoc_frame_index and giveback urb to device driver if needed,
> otherwise, the MDATA packet will be lost.
>
> A typical test case is that connect the dwc2 controller with an
> usb hs Hub (GL852G-12), and plug an usb fs audio device (Plantronics
> headset) into the downstream port of Hub. Then use the usb mic
> to record, we can find noise when playback.
>
> In the case, the isoc split in transaction sequence like this:
>
> - SSPLIT IN transaction
> - CSPLIT IN transaction
>   - MDATA packet (176 bytes)
> - CSPLIT IN transaction
>   - DATA0 packet (0 byte)
>
> This patch use both the length of DATA0 and qtd->isoc_split_offset
> to check if the DATA0 is in the second transaction.
>
> Signed-off-by: William Wu <william.wu@...k-chips.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Modify the commit message
>
>  drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_intr.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_intr.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_intr.c
> index 5e2378f..479f628 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_intr.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd_intr.c
> @@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ static int dwc2_xfercomp_isoc_split_in(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg,
>         frame_desc = &qtd->urb->iso_descs[qtd->isoc_frame_index];
>         len = dwc2_get_actual_xfer_length(hsotg, chan, chnum, qtd,
>                                           DWC2_HC_XFER_COMPLETE, NULL);
> -       if (!len) {
> +       if (!len && !qtd->isoc_split_offset) {
>                 qtd->complete_split = 0;
>                 qtd->isoc_split_offset = 0;
>                 return 0;

I don't think my USB-fu is strong enough to do a real review of this
patch, but one small nitpick is that you can remove
"qtd->isoc_split_offset = 0" in the if test now.  AKA:

if (!len && !qtd->isoc_split_offset) {
  qtd->complete_split = 0;
  return 0;
}

...since you only enter the "if" test now when isoc_split_offset is
already 0...  Hopefully John Youn will have some time to comment on
this patch with more real USB knowledge...


-Doug