linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rockchip tree with the renesas tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 May 2018 08:43:34 +0200
From:   Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
        Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rockchip tree with the renesas
 tree

[CC Arnd, Olof, Kevin, Linux-Renesas-SoC ML]

Thanks Stephen,

the resolution seems correct to me.

Arnd, Olof, Kevin, how would you like to handle this?
I'd be quite happy for the commits in my tree, the first two mentioned
below to be merged elsewhere or deferred until the next release if
it would make things easier for you.

On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 08:36:54AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Heiko,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the rockchip tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   93f7bfd930c0 ("arm64: defconfig: makes SND_SIMPLE_CARD to module")
>   ddf3fa8b8a16 ("arm64: defconfig: Enable CONFIG_SND_AUDIO_GRAPH_CARD")
> 
> from the renesas tree and commit:
> 
>   e9cfce4195ec ("arm64: defconfig: Enable HID over I2C drivers")
> 
> from the rockchip tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> index 7930caf5dde4,34037d24fbf4..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> @@@ -158,9 -157,9 +158,10 @@@ CONFIG_BT_HIDP=
>   # CONFIG_BT_LE is not set
>   CONFIG_BT_LEDS=y
>   # CONFIG_BT_DEBUGFS is not set
> + CONFIG_BT_HCIBTUSB=m
>   CONFIG_BT_HCIUART=m
>   CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_LL=y
>  +CONFIG_BT_HCIUART_BCM=y
>   CONFIG_CFG80211=m
>   CONFIG_MAC80211=m
>   CONFIG_MAC80211_LEDS=y
> @@@ -443,8 -447,8 +451,9 @@@ CONFIG_SND_BCM2835_SOC_I2S=
>   CONFIG_SND_SOC_SAMSUNG=y
>   CONFIG_SND_SOC_RCAR=m
>   CONFIG_SND_SOC_AK4613=m
>  -CONFIG_SND_SIMPLE_CARD=y
>  +CONFIG_SND_SIMPLE_CARD=m
>  +CONFIG_SND_AUDIO_GRAPH_CARD=m
> + CONFIG_I2C_HID=m
>   CONFIG_USB=y
>   CONFIG_USB_OTG=y
>   CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y