linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] drm/tegra: plane: Implement zPos plane property for older Tegra's

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 4 May 2018 15:32:06 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] drm/tegra: plane: Implement zPos plane property
 for older Tegra's

On 04.05.2018 15:15, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:08:43AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Older Tegra's do not support planes z position handling in hardware,
>> but HW provides knobs for zPos implementation in software.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c    | 134 ++++++++++++++++-------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/plane.c | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/plane.h |  13 ++-
>>  3 files changed, 244 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
> 
> This is obviously a lot to review, but it looks pretty good. On minor
> comment below.
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c
>> index 2e81142281c3..ba5481cd470d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c
>> @@ -162,29 +162,90 @@ static void tegra_plane_setup_blending_legacy(struct tegra_plane *plane)
> [...]
>> +		case 1:
>> +			/*
>> +			 * When both middle and topmost windows have an alpha,
>> +			 * these windows a mixed together and then the result
>> +			 * is blended over the bottom window.
>> +			 */
>> +			if ((state->blending[0].alpha &&
>> +			     state->blending[0].top))
> 
> There seems to be one pair of parentheses too much here.

Good catch ;)