[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 19:37:20 +0300
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: overlayfs <linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
"J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@...il.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...eaurora.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] overlayfs: stack file operations
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> Git tree is here:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git overlayfs-rorw
>
> Thanks everyone for your review.
>
> Force pushed new version to the above branch.
>
> Hopefully no comment was missed (I didn't add more reverts yet, those
> can wait). I'll do a mailbomb as well next week and start processing
> the metacopy patches.
>
Ran -g auto xfstests on overlay over xfs+reflink.
There are no failures and no changes w.r.t skipped tests since v4.17-rc1.
ACK on w.r.t addressing my review comments.
ACK on the freeze protection fix.
Not sure if the fact that we take __mnt_want_write() on overlay and not on
upper_mnt for ovl_real_ioctl() is a problem (i.e. can upper_mnt become
readonly from under overlay? and do we care?).
Thanks,
Amir.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists