lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 9 May 2018 10:17:07 +0530
From:   "Agrawal, Akshu" <Akshu.Agrawal@....com>
To:     "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>
Cc:     "djkurtz@...omium.org" <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
        "mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        "sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        "Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@....com>,
        "airlied@...hat.com" <airlied@...hat.com>,
        "Liu, Shaoyun" <Shaoyun.Liu@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] clk: x86: Add ST oscout platform clock



On 5/8/2018 9:08 PM, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Agrawal, Akshu
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 12:04 AM
>> To: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@....com>
>> Cc: djkurtz@...omium.org; mturquette@...libre.com; sboyd@...nel.org;
>> Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig@....com>; airlied@...hat.com; Liu,
>> Shaoyun <Shaoyun.Liu@....com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>> clk@...r.kernel.org; rjw@...ysocki.net; lenb@...nel.org; linux-
>> acpi@...r.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] clk: x86: Add ST oscout platform clock
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/8/2018 3:14 AM, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Agrawal, Akshu
>>>> Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 6:14 AM
>>>> Cc: djkurtz@...omium.org; Agrawal, Akshu <Akshu.Agrawal@....com>;
>>>> Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@....com>;
>>>> mturquette@...libre.com; sboyd@...nel.org; Koenig, Christian
>>>> <Christian.Koenig@....com>; airlied@...hat.com; Liu, Shaoyun
>>>> <Shaoyun.Liu@....com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>>>> clk@...r.kernel.org; rjw@...ysocki.net; lenb@...nel.org; linux-
>>>> acpi@...r.kernel.org
>>>> Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] clk: x86: Add ST oscout platform clock
>>>>
>>>> Stoney SoC provides oscout clock. This clock can support 25Mhz and
>>>> 48Mhz of frequency.
>>>> The clock is available for general system use.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Akshu Agrawal <akshu.agrawal@....com>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2: config change, added SPDX tag and used clk_hw_register_.
>>>> v3: Fix kbuild warning for checking of NULL pointer
>>>> v4: unregister clk_hw in driver remove, add .suppress_bind_attrs
>>>>  drivers/clk/x86/Makefile             |  3 +-
>>>>  drivers/clk/x86/clk-st.c             | 85
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  include/linux/platform_data/clk-st.h | 17 ++++++++
>>>>  3 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)  create mode
>>>> 100644 drivers/clk/x86/clk-st.c  create mode 100644
>>>> include/linux/platform_data/clk-st.h
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/x86/Makefile b/drivers/clk/x86/Makefile
>>>> index 1367afb..00303bc 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/x86/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/x86/Makefile
>>>> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_PMC_ATOM)		+= clk-pmc-atom.o
>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_X86_AMD_PLATFORM_DEVICE)	+= clk-st.o
>>>>  clk-x86-lpss-objs		:= clk-lpt.o
>>>>  obj-$(CONFIG_X86_INTEL_LPSS)	+= clk-x86-lpss.o
>>>> -obj-$(CONFIG_PMC_ATOM)		+= clk-pmc-atom.o
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/x86/clk-st.c b/drivers/clk/x86/clk-st.c new
>>>> file mode
>>>> 100644 index 0000000..8a7795c
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/x86/clk-st.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>
>>> Should this be MIT?  The original license was MIT.
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>
>> We are adding SPDX tag, while license remains same GPL-2.0
>>
>> What I have read is this is "to provide license identifiers inside the source
>> code that could be easily parsed by machines and would allow checking for
>> license compliance of an open source project easier."
> 
> My point as just that the original license on the file that you first sent out was MIT so the SPDX tag should be MIT rather than GPL.  E.g.,
> SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> 
Oh right it should be MIT, will change it.

Thanks,
Akshu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ