linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 04/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Clear ACS P2P flags for all devices behind switches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 9 May 2018 11:52:04 -0400
From:   Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>
To:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>
Cc:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
        Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/14] PCI/P2PDMA: Clear ACS P2P flags for all devices
 behind switches

On 05/09/2018 10:44 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2018 12:35:56 +0000
> "Stephen  Bates" <sbates@...thlin.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Alex and Don
>>
>>>     Correct, the VM has no concept of the host's IOMMU groups, only
>>> the hypervisor knows about the groups,
>>
>> But as I understand it these groups are usually passed through to VMs
>> on a pre-group basis by the hypervisor? So IOMMU group 1 might be
>> passed to VM A and IOMMU group 2 passed to VM B. So I agree the VM is
>> not aware of IOMMU groupings but it is impacted by them in the sense
>> that if the groupings change the PCI topology presented to the VM
>> needs to change too.
> 
> Hypervisors don't currently expose any topology based on the grouping,
> the only case where such a concept even makes sense is when a vIOMMU is
> present as devices within the same group cannot have separate address
> spaces.  Our options for exposing such information is also limited, our
> only real option would seem to be placing devices within the same group
> together on a conventional PCI bus to denote the address space
> granularity.  Currently we strongly recommend singleton groups for this
> case and leave any additional configuration constraints to the admin.
> 
> The case you note of a group passed to VM A and another passed to VM B
> is exactly an example of why any sort of dynamic routing change needs to
> have the groups fully released, such as via hot-unplug.  For instance,
> a routing change at a shared node above groups 1 & 2 could result in
> the merging of these groups and there is absolutely no way to handle
> that with portions of the group being owned by two separate VMs after
> the merge.  Thanks,
> 
> Alex
> 
The above is why I stated the host/HV has to do p2p setup *before* device-assignment
is done.
Now, that could be done at boot time (with a mod.conf-like config in host/HV, before VM startup)
as well.
Dynamically, if such a feature is needed, requires a hot-unplug/plug cycling as Alex states.