linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the powerpc-fixes tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 May 2018 10:45:02 +1000
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the powerpc-fixes tree

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc tree got a conflict in:
>
>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h
>
> between commit:
>
>   edf6a2dfe388 ("powerpc/trace/syscalls: Update syscall name matching logic to account for ppc_ prefix")
>
> from the powerpc-fixes tree and commit:
>
>   c3e59d778403 ("powerpc64/ftrace: Rearrange #ifdef sections in ftrace.h")
>
> from the powerpc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> Michael, I think the version in your merge branch is not quite right ...

Yep.

Don't do merges after midnight kids.

I've pushed a fixed version, which I think matches yours.

I'll resolve it in my next when I merge my fixes & next later in the
cycle.

cheers