| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 19:48:48 +0530
From: poza@...eaurora.org
To: okaya@...eaurora.org
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@...wei.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>, Wei Zhang <wzhang@...com>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
linux-pci-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 3/9] PCI/AER: Handle ERR_FATAL with removal and
re-enumeration of devices
On 2018-05-10 18:45, okaya@...eaurora.org wrote:
> On 2018-05-10 14:10, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:31:16PM +0530, poza@...eaurora.org wrote:
>>> On 2018-05-10 04:51, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 06:44:53PM +0530, poza@...eaurora.org wrote:
>>> > > On 2018-05-09 18:37, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> > > > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 06:53:30PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> > > > > On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 01:03:52AM -0400, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
>>> > > > > > This patch alters the behavior of handling of ERR_FATAL, where removal
>>> > > > > > of devices is initiated, followed by reset link, followed by
>>> > > > > > re-enumeration.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > So the errors are handled in a different way as follows:
>>> > > > > > ERR_NONFATAL => call driver recovery entry points
>>> > > > > > ERR_FATAL => remove and re-enumerate
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > please refer to Documentation/PCI/pci-error-recovery.txt for more details.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Oza Pawandeep <poza@...eaurora.org>
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c
>>> > > > > > index 779b387..206f590 100644
>>> > > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c
>>> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.c
>>> > > > > > @@ -330,6 +330,13 @@ static pci_ers_result_t aer_root_reset(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>> > > > > > reg32 |= ROOT_PORT_INTR_ON_MESG_MASK;
>>> > > > > > pci_write_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, reg32);
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > + /*
>>> > > > > > + * This function is called only on ERR_FATAL now, and since
>>> > > > > > + * the pci_report_resume is called only in ERR_NONFATAL case,
>>> > > > > > + * the clearing part has to be taken care here.
>>> > > > > > + */
>>> > > > > > + aer_error_resume(dev);
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > I don't understand this part. Previously the ERR_FATAL path looked
>>> > > > > like
>>> > > > > this:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > do_recovery
>>> > > > > reset_link
>>> > > > > driver->reset_link
>>> > > > > aer_root_reset
>>> > > > > pci_reset_bridge_secondary_bus # <-- reset
>>> > > > > broadcast_error_message(..., report_resume)
>>> > > > > pci_walk_bus(..., report_resume, ...)
>>> > > > > report_resume
>>> > > > > if (cb == report_resume)
>>> > > > > pci_cleanup_aer_uncorrect_error_status
>>> > > > > pci_write_config_dword(PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS) # <-- clear
>>> > > > > status
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > After this patch, it will look like this:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > do_recovery
>>> > > > > do_fatal_recovery
>>> > > > > pci_cleanup_aer_uncorrect_error_status
>>> > > > > pci_write_config_dword(PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS) # <-- clear
>>> > > > > status
>>> > > > > reset_link
>>> > > > > driver->reset_link
>>> > > > > aer_root_reset
>>> > > > > pci_reset_bridge_secondary_bus # <-- reset
>>> > > > > aer_error_resume
>>> > > > > pcie_capability_write_word(PCI_EXP_DEVSTA) #
>>> > > > > <-- clear more
>>> > > > > pci_write_config_dword(PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS) #
>>> > > > > <-- clear status
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > So if I'm understanding correctly, the new path clears the status too
>>> > > > > early, then clears it again (plus clearing DEVSTA, which we didn't do
>>> > > > > before) later.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > I would think we would want to leave aer_root_reset() alone, and
>>> > > > > just move
>>> > > > > the pci_cleanup_aer_uncorrect_error_status() in do_fatal_recovery()
>>> > > > > down so
>>> > > > > it happens after we call reset_link(). That way the reset/clear
>>> > > > > sequence
>>> > > > > would be the same as it was before.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I've been fiddling with this a bit myself and will post the results to
>>> > > > see
>>> > > > what you think.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > ok so you are suggesting to move
>>> > > pci_cleanup_aer_uncorrect_error_status down
>>> > > which I can do.
>>> > >
>>> > > And not to call aer_error_resume, because you think its clearing the
>>> > > status
>>> > > again.
>>> > >
>>> > > following code: calls aer_error_resume.
>>> > > pci_broadcast_error_message()
>>> > > /*
>>> > > * If the error is reported by an end point, we
>>> > > think this
>>> > > * error is related to the upstream link of the end
>>> > > point.
>>> > > */
>>> > > if (state == pci_channel_io_normal)
>>> > > /*
>>> > > * the error is non fatal so the bus is ok,
>>> > > just
>>> > > invoke
>>> > > * the callback for the function that logged
>>> > > the
>>> > > error.
>>> > > */
>>> > > cb(dev, &result_data);
>>> > > else
>>> > > pci_walk_bus(dev->bus, cb, &result_data);
>>> >
>>> > Holy crap, I thought this could not possibly get any more complicated,
>>> > but you're right; we do actually call aer_error_resume() today via an
>>> > extremely convoluted path:
>>> >
>>> > do_recovery(pci_dev)
>>> > broadcast_error_message(..., error_detected, ...)
>>> > if (AER_FATAL)
>>> > reset_link(pci_dev)
>>> > udev = BRIDGE ? pci_dev : pci_dev->bus->self
>>> > driver->reset_link(udev)
>>> > aer_root_reset(udev)
>>> > if (CAN_RECOVER)
>>> > broadcast_error_message(..., mmio_enabled, ...)
>>> > if (NEED_RESET)
>>> > broadcast_error_message(..., slot_reset, ...)
>>> > broadcast_error_message(dev, ..., report_resume, ...)
>>> > if (BRIDGE)
>>> > report_resume
>>> > driver->resume
>>> > pcie_portdrv_err_resume
>>> > device_for_each_child(..., resume_iter)
>>> > resume_iter
>>> > driver->error_resume
>>> > aer_error_resume
>>> > pci_cleanup_aer_uncorrect_error_status(pci_dev) # only if
>>> > BRIDGE
>>> > pci_write_config_dword(PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS)
>>> >
>>> > aerdriver is the only port service driver that implements
>>> > .error_resume(), and aerdriver only binds to root ports. I can't
>>> > really believe all these device_for_each_child()/resume_iter()
>>> > gyrations are necessary when this is AER code calling AER code.
>>> >
>>> > Bjorn
>>>
>>> here is the code of do_fatal_recovery, where I have moved the things
>>> down
>>> and doing only if it is bridge.
>>> let me know how this looks to you, so then I can post v16.
>>
>> This looks superficially OK. It is very difficult for me to verify
>> that
>> the behavior is equivalent to the current code, but that's not your
>> fault;
>> it's just a consequence of the existing design.
>>
>> I have a couple trivial comments elsewhere, and I'll respond to those
>> patches individually.
>>
>>> static pci_ers_result_t do_fatal_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev, int
>>> severity)
>>> {
>>> struct pci_dev *udev;
>>> struct pci_bus *parent;
>>> struct pci_dev *pdev, *temp;
>>> struct aer_broadcast_data result_data;
>>> pci_ers_result_t result = PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
>>>
>>>
>>> if (dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE)
>>> udev = dev;
>>> else
>>> udev = dev->bus->self;
>>>
>>> parent = udev->subordinate;
>>> pci_lock_rescan_remove();
>>> list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(pdev, temp,
>>> &parent->devices,
>>> bus_list) {
>>> pci_dev_get(pdev);
>>> pci_dev_set_disconnected(pdev, NULL);
>>> if (pci_has_subordinate(pdev))
>>> pci_walk_bus(pdev->subordinate,
>>> pci_dev_set_disconnected, NULL);
>>> pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(pdev);
>>> pci_dev_put(pdev);
>>> }
>>>
>>> result = reset_link(udev, severity);
>>> if (severity == AER_FATAL && dev->hdr_type ==
>>> PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) {
>>> pci_walk_bus(dev->subordinate, report_resume,
>>> &result_data);
>
> Why are we calling resume?
the reason we have to call resume here, because we are not calling
aer_resume() any more in root_reset.
and we have to call resume only in bridge case.
please have a look at couple of conversation back with Bjorn.
the objective is to align the sequence close to the current code.
>
>>> pci_cleanup_aer_uncorrect_error_status(dev);
>>> dev->error_state = pci_channel_io_normal;
>>> }
>>> if (result == PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED)
>>> if (pcie_wait_for_link(udev, true))
>>> pci_rescan_bus(udev->bus);
>>>
>>> pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
>>>
>>> return result;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Oza.
>>>
>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists