linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mm: allow deferred page init for vmemmap only

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 May 2018 10:17:55 -0400
From:   Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
To:     mhocko@...nel.org
Cc:     Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        mgorman@...hsingularity.net, mingo@...nel.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
        Dennis Zhou <dennisszhou@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: allow deferred page init for vmemmap only

> Thanks that helped me to see the problem. On the other hand isn't this a
> bit of an overkill? AFAICS this affects only NEED_PER_CPU_KM which is !SMP
> and DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT makes only very limited sense on UP,
> right?

> Or do we have more such places?

I do not know other places, but my worry is that trap_init() is arch
specific and we cannot guarantee that arches won't do virt to phys in
trap_init() in other places. Therefore, I think a proper fix is simply
allow DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT when it is safe to do virt to phys without
accessing struct pages, which is with SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP.