linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/cgroup: memory controller self-tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 May 2018 13:02:50 -0700
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc:     Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, kernel-team@...com,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/cgroup: memory controller self-tests

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 01:33:26PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Yeah. I see that. You have a switch for the KSFT_ values. Since there is no
> dependency on the cgroup tree, I would recommend having this patch go through
> kselftest tree which is the normal process for tests anyway.
> 
> This version is good and I can apply this to linux-kselftest next. I ran a
> quick test and the Skip case looks good.
> 
> TAP version 13
> selftests: cgroup: test_memcontrol
> ========================================
> 1..0 # Skipped: memory controller isn't available
> not ok 1..1 selftests: cgroup: test_memcontrol [SKIP]
> 
> 
> Tejun! Please send me your Ack.

Sure, please feel free to add my ack.  I'll revert the original patch
from cgroup tree.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun