lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 11 May 2018 11:23:14 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/18] printk: Convert pr_fmt from blank define to
 KBUILD_MODNAME

On (05/11/18 10:51), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> In general, the idea looks OK to me, so FWIW
> Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>

Looking at dmesg,

Base:
[    0.000000] KERNEL supported cpus:
[    0.000000]   Intel GenuineIntel
[...]
[    0.000000]   00000-9FFFF write-back
[    0.000000]   A0000-BFFFF uncachable
[    0.000000]   C0000-FFFFF write-protect
[    0.000000] MTRR variable ranges enabled:
[    0.000000]   0 base 00E0000000 mask 7FE0000000 uncachable
[    0.000000]   1 disabled
[    0.000000]   2 disabled
[    0.000000]   3 disabled
[    0.000000]   4 disabled
[..]

Patched:
[    0.000000] common: KERNEL supported cpus:
[    0.000000] common:   Intel GenuineIntel
[...]
[    0.000000] generic: MTRR default type: write-back
[    0.000000] generic: MTRR fixed ranges enabled:
[    0.000000] generic:   00000-9FFFF write-back
[    0.000000] generic:   A0000-BFFFF uncachable
[    0.000000] generic:   C0000-FFFFF write-protect
[    0.000000] generic: MTRR variable ranges enabled:
[    0.000000] generic:   0 base 00E0000000 mask 7FE0000000 uncachable
[    0.000000] generic:   1 disabled
[    0.000000] generic:   2 disabled
[    0.000000] generic:   3 disabled
[    0.000000] generic:   4 disabled
[..]

Is it correct that WARN_ON() from "generic: " will now also be prefixed?
In other words, we will have something like this

[   28.420519] generic: RSP: 0018:ffffa01dc062bda8 EFLAGS: 00010282
[   28.420522] generic: RAX: ffffffff8317612f RBX: ffffffffffffffea RCX: ffffa01dc062bdc8
[   28.420523] generic: RDX: 000055a6a3f03110 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffff83e31540
[   28.420525] generic: RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: ffffa01dc062bec0 R09: 0000000000000004
[   28.420526] generic: R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001
[   28.420528] generic: R13: ffffffff83e31540 R14: ffffa01dc062bec0 R15: 0000000000000002
[   28.420547] generic: ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x5d/0x63
[   28.420549] generic: ? rcu_sync_lockdep_assert+0x2e/0x54
[   28.420551] generic: ? __sb_start_write+0xeb/0x1a3

Correct?

	-ss

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ