lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 12 May 2018 08:47:30 +0800
From:   Yanjun Zhu <yanjun.zhu@...cle.com>
To:     Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
        DaeRyong Jeong <threeearcat@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        rds-devel@....oracle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        byoungyoung@...due.edu, kt0755@...il.com
Subject: Re: KASAN: null-ptr-deref Read in rds_ib_get_mr



On 2018/5/12 0:58, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On 5/11/2018 12:48 AM, Yanjun Zhu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2018/5/11 13:20, DaeRyong Jeong wrote:
>>> We report the crash: KASAN: null-ptr-deref Read in rds_ib_get_mr
>>>
>>> Note that this bug is previously reported by syzkaller.
>>> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=0bb56a5a48b000b52aa2b0d8dd20b1f545214d91 
>>>
>>> Nonetheless, this bug has not fixed yet, and we hope that this 
>>> report and our
>>> analysis, which gets help by the RaceFuzzer's feature, will helpful 
>>> to fix the
>>> crash.
>>>
>>> This crash has been found in v4.17-rc1 using RaceFuzzer (a modified
>>> version of Syzkaller), which we describe more at the end of this
>>> report. Our analysis shows that the race occurs when invoking two
>>> syscalls concurrently, bind$rds and setsockopt$RDS_GET_MR.
>>>
>>>
>>> Analysis:
>>> We think the concurrent execution of __rds_rdma_map() and rds_bind()
>>> causes the problem. __rds_rdma_map() checks whether 
>>> rs->rs_bound_addr is 0
>>> or not. But the concurrent execution with rds_bind() can by-pass this
>>> check. Therefore, __rds_rdmap_map() calls rs->rs_transport->get_mr() 
>>> and
>>> rds_ib_get_mr() causes the null deref at ib_rdma.c:544 in v4.17-rc1, 
>>> when
>>> dereferencing rs_conn.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thread interleaving:
>>> CPU0 (__rds_rdma_map)                    CPU1 (rds_bind)
>>>                             // rds_add_bound() sets rs->bound_addr 
>>> as none 0
>>>                             ret = rds_add_bound(rs, 
>>> sin->sin_addr.s_addr, &sin->sin_port);
>>> if (rs->rs_bound_addr == 0 || !rs->rs_transport) {
>>>     ret = -ENOTCONN; /* XXX not a great errno */
>>>     goto out;
>>> }
>>>                             if (rs->rs_transport) { /* previously 
>>> bound */
>>>                                 trans = rs->rs_transport;
>>>                                 if 
>>> (trans->laddr_check(sock_net(sock->sk),
>>> sin->sin_addr.s_addr) != 0) {
>>>                                     ret = -ENOPROTOOPT;
>>>                                     // rds_remove_bound() sets 
>>> rs->bound_addr as 0
>>>                                     rds_remove_bound(rs);
>>> ...
>>> trans_private = rs->rs_transport->get_mr(sg, nents, rs,
>>>                      &mr->r_key);
>>> (in rds_ib_get_mr())
>>> struct rds_ib_connection *ic = rs->rs_conn->c_transport_data;
>>>
>>>
>>> Call sequence (v4.17-rc1):
>>> CPU0
>>> rds_setsockopt
>>>     rds_get_mr
>>>         __rds_rdma_map
>>>             rds_ib_get_mr
>>>
>>>
>>> CPU1
>>> rds_bind
>>>     rds_add_bound
>>>     ...
>>>     rds_remove_bound
>>>
>>>
>>> Crash log:
>>> ==================================================================
>>> BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in rds_ib_get_mr+0x3a/0x150 
>>> net/rds/ib_rdma.c:544
>>> Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000068 by task syz-executor0/32067
>>>
>>> CPU: 0 PID: 32067 Comm: syz-executor0 Not tainted 4.17.0-rc1 #1
>>> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 
>>> rel-1.8.2-0-g33fbe13 by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
>>> Call Trace:
>>>   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
>>>   dump_stack+0x166/0x21c lib/dump_stack.c:113
>>>   kasan_report_error mm/kasan/report.c:352 [inline]
>>>   kasan_report+0x140/0x360 mm/kasan/report.c:412
>>>   check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/kasan.c:260 [inline]
>>>   __asan_load8+0x54/0x90 mm/kasan/kasan.c:699
>>>   rds_ib_get_mr+0x3a/0x150 net/rds/ib_rdma.c:544
>>>   __rds_rdma_map+0x521/0x9d0 net/rds/rdma.c:271
>>>   rds_get_mr+0xad/0xf0 net/rds/rdma.c:333
>>>   rds_setsockopt+0x57f/0x720 net/rds/af_rds.c:347
>>>   __sys_setsockopt+0x147/0x230 net/socket.c:1903
>>>   __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:1914 [inline]
>>>   __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:1911 [inline]
>>>   __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x67/0x80 net/socket.c:1911
>>>   do_syscall_64+0x15f/0x4a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
>>>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
>>> RIP: 0033:0x4563f9
>>> RSP: 002b:00007f6a2b3c2b28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036
>>> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000072bee0 RCX: 00000000004563f9
>>> RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000114 RDI: 0000000000000015
>>> RBP: 0000000000000575 R08: 0000000000000020 R09: 0000000000000000
>>> R10: 0000000020000140 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f6a2b3c36d4
>>> R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 00000000006fd398 R15: 0000000000000000
>>> ==================================================================
>> diff --git a/net/rds/ib_rdma.c b/net/rds/ib_rdma.c
>> index e678699..2228b50 100644
>> --- a/net/rds/ib_rdma.c
>> +++ b/net/rds/ib_rdma.c
>> @@ -539,11 +539,17 @@ void rds_ib_flush_mrs(void)
>>   void *rds_ib_get_mr(struct scatterlist *sg, unsigned long nents,
>>                      struct rds_sock *rs, u32 *key_ret)
>>   {
>> -       struct rds_ib_device *rds_ibdev;
>> +       struct rds_ib_device *rds_ibdev = NULL;
>>          struct rds_ib_mr *ibmr = NULL;
>> -       struct rds_ib_connection *ic = rs->rs_conn->c_transport_data;
>> +       struct rds_ib_connection *ic = NULL;
>>          int ret;
>>
>> +       if (rs->rs_bound_addr == 0) {
>> +               ret = -EPERM;
>> +               goto out;
>> +       }
>> +
> No you can't return such error for this API and the
> socket related checks needs to be done at core layer.
> I remember fixing this race but probably never pushed
> fix upstream.
OK. Wait for your patch. :-)
>
> The MR code is due for update with optimized FRWR code
> which now stable enough. We will address this issue as
> well as part of that patchset.
>
> Thanks for looking into it.
>
> Regards,
> Santosh
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ