lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 01:21:32 +0000 From: "Dey, Megha" <megha.dey@...el.com> To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: RE: [PATCH V8 1/5] crypto: Multi-buffer encryption infrastructure support >-----Original Message----- >From: Herbert Xu [mailto:herbert@...dor.apana.org.au] >Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 9:46 PM >To: Dey, Megha <megha.dey@...el.com> >Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org; >davem@...emloft.net >Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 1/5] crypto: Multi-buffer encryption infrastructure >support > >On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 01:24:42AM +0000, Dey, Megha wrote: >> >> Are you suggesting that the SIMD wrapper, will do what is currently being >done by the ' mcryptd_queue_worker ' function (assuming FPU is not disabled) >i.e dispatching the job to the inner algorithm? >> >> I have got rid of the mcryptd layer( have an inner layer, outer SIMD layer, >handled the pointers and completions accordingly), but still facing some issues >after removing the per cpu mcryptd_cpu_queue. > >Why don't you post what you've got and we can work it out together? Hi Herbert, Sure, I will post an RFC patch. (crypto: Remove mcryptd). > >Thanks, >-- >Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Home Page: >http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ >PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists