linux-kernel - Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in corrupted

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 13 May 2018 12:32:47 +0200
From:   Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+3417712847e7219a60ee@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        hmclauchlan@...com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in corrupted

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 12:20 PM, Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> This looks very similar to "KASAN: use-after-free Read in fuse_kill_sb_blk":
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/syzkaller-bugs/4C4oiBX8vZ0/0NTQRcUYBgAJ
>>
>> which you fixed with "fuse: don't keep dead fuse_conn at fuse_fill_super().":
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/syzkaller-bugs/4C4oiBX8vZ0/W6pi8NdbBgAJ
>>
>> However, here we have use-after-free in fuse_kill_sb_anon instead of
>> use_kill_sb_blk. Do you think your patch will fix this as well?
>
> Yes, for fuse_kill_sb_anon() and fuse_kill_sb_blk() are symmetrical.
> I'm waiting for Miklos Szeredi to apply that patch.


Thanks for confirming. Let's do:

#syz fix: fuse: don't keep dead fuse_conn at fuse_fill_super().


> static inline struct fuse_conn *get_fuse_conn_super(struct super_block *sb)
> {
>         return sb->s_fs_info;
> }
>
> static struct file_system_type fuse_fs_type = {
>         .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
>         .name           = "fuse",
>         .fs_flags       = FS_HAS_SUBTYPE,
>         .mount          = fuse_mount,
>         .kill_sb        = fuse_kill_sb_anon,
> };
>
> static struct file_system_type fuseblk_fs_type = {
>         .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
>         .name           = "fuseblk",
>         .mount          = fuse_mount_blk,
>         .kill_sb        = fuse_kill_sb_blk,
>         .fs_flags       = FS_REQUIRES_DEV | FS_HAS_SUBTYPE,
> };
>
> static void fuse_kill_sb_anon(struct super_block *sb)
> {
>         struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn_super(sb);
>
>         if (fc) {
>                 down_write(&fc->killsb);
>                 fc->sb = NULL;
>                 up_write(&fc->killsb);
>         }
>
>         kill_anon_super(sb);
> }
>
> static void fuse_kill_sb_blk(struct super_block *sb)
> {
>         struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn_super(sb);
>
>         if (fc) {
>                 down_write(&fc->killsb);
>                 fc->sb = NULL;
>                 up_write(&fc->killsb);
>         }
>
>         kill_block_super(sb);
> }