linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mm: allow deferred page init for vmemmap only

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 15 May 2018 22:38:30 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
Cc:     Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        mgorman@...hsingularity.net, mingo@...nel.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
        Dennis Zhou <dennisszhou@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: allow deferred page init for vmemmap only

On Tue 15-05-18 11:59:25, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > This will always be a maze as the early boot tends to be. Sad but true.
> > That is why I am not really convinced we should use a large hammer and
> > disallow deferred page initialization just because UP implementation of
> > pcp does something too early. We should instead rule that one odd case.
> > Your patch simply doesn't rule a large class of potential issues. It
> > just rules out a potentially useful feature for an odd case. See my
> > point?
> 
> Hi Michal,
> 
> OK, I will send an updated patch with disabling deferred pages only whe
> NEED_PER_CPU_KM. Hopefully, we won't see similar issues in other places.

If we do we will probably need to think more about a more systematic
solution.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs