linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] KVM/X86: Introduce a new guest mapping interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 15 May 2018 12:06:58 -0400
From:   Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Raslan, KarimAllah" <karahmed@...zon.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        "david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] KVM/X86: Introduce a new guest mapping interface

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 02:27:13PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 16/04/2018 14:09, Raslan, KarimAllah wrote:
> >> I assume the caching will also be a separate patch.
> > Yup, do you want me to include it in this one? I already have it, I
> > just thought that I get those bits out first.
> 
> It's the same for me.
> 
> Paolo
> 
> >> It looks good except that I'd squash patches 4 and 9 together.
> > Yup, makes sense. I should have squashed them when I removed the 
> > lifecycle change!
> > 
> > Thanks for the review :)
> > 
> >> But I'd like a second set of eyes to look at it.

Did anybody else end up reviewing these patches? And would it make sense
to repost a new version with the #4 and #9 squashed? Thanks.

>