linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] clk: x86: Add ST oscout platform clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 May 2018 14:18:26 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Agrawal, Akshu" <Akshu.Agrawal@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
        Alex Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, Shaoyun.Liu@....com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] clk: x86: Add ST oscout platform clock

Quoting Rafael J. Wysocki (2018-05-16 01:23:27)
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:14 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Quoting Agrawal, Akshu (2018-05-15 02:39:08)
> >>
> >>
> >> On 5/15/2018 3:02 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 11:59:00 AM CEST Akshu Agrawal wrote:
> >> >> Stoney SoC provides oscout clock. This clock can support 25Mhz and
> >> >> 48Mhz of frequency.
> >> >> The clock is available for general system use.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Akshu Agrawal <akshu.agrawal@....com>
> >> >
> >> > I'm not sure if the Stephen Boyd's comments on one of the previous
> >> > versions of this patch have been addressed.  Have they?
> >> >
> >> > In any case, if I'm expected to take this, I need an ACK from Stephen on it.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Rafael
> >> >
> >>
> >> All comments of Stephen Boyd and Daniel Kurtz have been addressed.
> >>
> >> Stephen, if you are Ok with this can you please ACK it.
> >>
> >
> > It could go via clk tree and meet up with the acpi patch in -next right?
> > I'm fine with it going through acpi path though so whichever way works.
> 
> It's better if it goes in as a series IMO and then if it goes via
> ACPI, the clock dependency will be clear from the git history.
> 
> So if you don't mind, I'll queue this series up for 4.18.
> 

Ok